Dataset solution for fundamental investors

Expand your opportunity set without expanding your team

Monitor companies globally, discover new ideas, and give your AI trusted company context — powered by structured fundamentals and real-time investment events.

Max your AI ability with better data

Same prompt — FocusAlpha connected (left) vs. open web search (right).
Cited from your connected sourcesFrom the open web
FocusAlpha
Connected source
Trusted

Here's what Micron (MU) looks like based on your research database, pulling from the FY2024 through Q2 FY2026 earnings calls.

Segments — note the reorganization

Micron renamed its reporting segments in FY2026. Latest mix (Q2 FY2026):

  • Cloud Memory (CMBU)$7.7B, ~32%. HBM, high-cap DIMMs, LP. Highest growth.
  • Mobile & Client (MCBU)$7.7B, ~32%. Smartphone + PC DRAM and storage.
  • Core Data Center (CDBU)$5.7B, ~24%. Enterprise/traditional server memory.
  • Automotive & Embedded (AEBU) $2.7B, ~11%. Auto, industrial, IoT/edge.

The drivers

1. AI data center demand → HBM. This is the dominant driver. HBM TAM went from ~$4B (2023) to $35B+ (2025), with management projecting $100B by 2028 — a HBM market that by 2030 would be bigger than the entire 2024 DRAM industry. GPUs/accelerators are "starved of memory bandwidth," and HBM feeds them. Micron has been sold out of HBM in 2024 and 2025 with pricing pre-locked, and reached HBM share parity with its overall DRAM share in 2025.

2. The HBM "trade ratio" tightens all DRAM supply. HBM3E consumes ~3x the silicon of standard DDR5 for the same bits; HBM4E is expected to exceed 4:1. Every wafer going to HBM removes capacity from conventional DRAM — which is why pricing is rising across all segments, not just AI. In Q2 FY26, DRAM prices rose in the mid-60s% sequentially.

3. Pricing + tight supply. Years of capex discipline cut industry wafer capacity below 2022 peaks. Combined with the HBM trade ratio, this produced a tight market and gross margins hitting a record 75% in Q2 FY26 (up from break-even/loss in early FY24).

MU FY2026 Q2 10-QMU Q2 FY26 earnings callMU Q4 FY25 earnings callMU FY2024 10-K
Direct web search
Web search source
Open web

Searched the web ›

Here's a clear picture of Micron, grounded in their most recent reported results (Q2 FY2026, reported March 18, 2026).

Key segments (reorganized in Q4 FY2025)

Micron now reports four business units aligned to end markets rather than product type:

  • CMBU – Cloud Memory: hyperscale cloud customers and HBM. The fastest-growing, highest-margin unit.
  • CDBU – Core Data Center: mid-tier cloud and enterprise (server DRAM, SSDs).
  • MCBU – Mobile & Client: smartphone and PC memory.
  • AEBU – Automotive & Embedded: auto, industrial, IoT.

What's driving the business

The dominant driver is the AI capex supercycle. Revenue went from $9.3B (Q3 FY2025) to ~$23.9B (Q2 FY2026), up ~196% YoY, with GAAP gross margin around 74% — extraordinary for a historically cyclical commodity business. Specific drivers:

  • HBM demand and pricing — HBM was reported sold out through most of 2026. Each new AI GPU generation needs more HBM content, and supply is tight, so pricing is strong.
  • Data-center DRAM shortage — building HBM consumes wafer capacity that would otherwise make standard DRAM, tightening the whole DRAM market.
  • Margin/mix shift — moving revenue toward high-value data-center products lifts margins well above prior-cycle peaks.
  • Capex and supply discipline — FY2026 capex guided above $25B to fund HBM/DRAM capacity; the key risk is an industry over-build.
No document-level citations. Segment reorganization dated to Q4 FY2025 — the filings put the renaming in FY2026.
01 — Never miss what matters across your coverage
Monitor hundreds of companies like you have an analyst working 24/7
Global sourcesReal-time eventsWhat matters to your portfolio
Prompt · 6:40 AM
What changed across my coverage overnight? Show me only events that could change my thesis.
4 thesis-relevant events out of 61 captured across 212 covered companies
Tokyo · Frankfurt · Seoul · New York
02:10 ET
Tokyo · TSE
Tokyo ElectronGuidanceJA → EN
Raised full-year operating profit guidance; cited stronger-than-expected orders for advanced logic and HBM-related tools.
Why it matters: Supports the semicap demand thesis; check read-through to your ASML position.
TSE filing · 8:00 JST
02:45 ET
Frankfurt · XETRA
InfineonManagementDE → EN
CFO to step down at year-end; successor named from within the automotive division.
Why it matters: Leadership change during the auto-inventory correction you flagged in Q2.
Ad-hoc release
03:30 ET
Seoul · KRX
SK hynixCapexKO → EN
Board approved additional HBM capacity investment; production ramp guided for the second half of next year.
Why it matters: Incremental supply may pressure HBM pricing assumptions in your MU model.
DART disclosure
06:05 ET
New York · SEC
Micron8-KEN
Amended a long-term supply agreement with a hyperscale customer; volume commitments extended through FY2028.
Why it matters: Directly relevant: locks in demand visibility your thesis depends on.
SEC 8-K
02 — Turn an investment thesis into a stock screen
Find ideas that traditional screeners can’t express
Investment thesisScreenResearch-ready ideas
Prompt
Find semiconductor companies where management raised guidance in the last two quarters and cited AI demand as a key driver.
4 of 138 semiconductor companies match
From earnings calls & guidance filings
Company
Guidance raised
AI cited as driver
Management commentary
Company A
U.S. · Networking silicon
Q1 ✓ Q2 ✓
Both quarters
Custom accelerator demand from hyperscalers continues to exceed our supply plan.
Company B
Taiwan · Foundry
Q1 ✓ Q2 ✓
Both quarters
AI-related revenue is now expected to grow at a mid-40s% CAGR through the planning horizon.
Company C
U.S. · Memory
Q1 ✓ Q2 ✓
Q2
HBM is sold out for the calendar year with pricing largely locked.
Company D
Netherlands · Equipment
Q1 ✓ Q2 ✓
Both quarters
Order intake reflects capacity additions tied to AI data-center buildouts.
Ask: Which of these also saw insider buying?Try: improving margins + accelerating revenue + recent insider buying
03 — Give your AI the facts before asking it to reason
Better company context. Fewer hallucinations.
Trusted dataBetter contextMore reliable research
Prompt
Compare Boeing and Airbus on backlog, deliveries, margins and management’s latest production outlook.
Structured context delivered to the agent before reasoning
Latest reported quarter
Metric
Boeing
Airbus
Source
Backlog
~5,900 aircraft
Commercial, firm orders
~8,700 aircraft
Commercial, firm orders
Latest 10-Q · H1 report
Deliveries (LTM)
~400
Constrained by 737 rate cap
~770
Engine supply the binding constraint
Monthly delivery releases
Operating margin
Negative
Commercial Airplanes segment
~8%
Adjusted EBIT, group
Latest 10-Q · H1 report
Production outlook
737 to rate 42, then 47
Pending FAA approval at each step
A320 family to rate 75 by 2027
Reaffirmed on latest call
Latest earnings calls
Agent’s read: Airbus leads on volume and profitability; Boeing’s thesis rests on executing the 737 rate increase while its backlog holds. Every figure above links to the filing or call it came from.
Ask: How has each outlook changed over the last 4 calls?Add supplier commentary
Your research team, always on
01Monitor
Know what changed across hundreds of companies, markets and time zones.
→ 02Discover
Screen for investment ideas using questions that traditional databases can’t answer.
→ 03Research
Ground your AI in trusted company data before asking it to reason.
Cover more. Miss less. Research deeper.
Start for free